| Home | Farsi | Adcocacy |

| Federal2025 |
| Provincial |
| Municipal | 2026 | 2022 | 2023 | 2018 |

 

 
 

Online Voting
Wikipedia

None of the above" (NOTA) is a ballot choice that lets voters reject all listed candidates.
A formal way to show disapproval for all candidates on a ballot rather than skipping the vote entirely

The City of Toronto has commissioned and discussed several staff reports and council decisions evaluating internet and alternative voting technologies over the past decade.

The primary City Clerk staff reports and City Council decisions on internet voting can be searched or cited as follows:

1. 2013–2014 Reports: The Disability Pilot Project & Cancellation

·         City Council Decision (June 2013) – Item GM22.15:

o    Context: City Council directed the City Clerk to create a working group to explore and implement an internet voting pilot for electors with disabilities for the 2014 municipal election.

o    Reference Link: Toronto City Council Item GM22.15 (June 2013)

·         City Council Authorization (February 2014) – Item CC48.4:

o    Context: City Council authorized the City Clerk to proceed with contracting a vendor (Scytl Canada Inc.) to deliver internet and telephone voting for electors with disabilities during advance voting in 2014.

o    Reference Link: Toronto City Council Item CC48.4 (February 2014)

·         City Clerk Report on Cancellation (July 2014) – Item CC54.5:

o    Context: The City Clerk submitted a report explaining the decision to cancel the internet voting pilot right before the election due to unresolved security, privacy, and technical vendor compliance risks. Council then directed the Clerk to report back on future potential implementations.

o    Reference Link: Toronto City Council Item CC54.5 (July 2014)

2. 2016–2018 Reports: Feasibility & Technology Risk Analysis

·         Executive Committee Report (November 2016) – Item EX19.6 / GM32.31:

o    Title: Changes to the Municipal Elections Act and Related Matters

o    Context: Following the 2014 cancellation, City staff re-evaluated election technology. Staff reported that there had been insufficient advances in internet security to accept the risks of implementing internet voting for the 2018 election. Staff noted that challenges regarding secrecy of the vote, verifiability, and cyber-attack vulnerabilities remained unresolved.

o    Reference Link: Toronto City Council Item EX19.6 Agenda History

3. 2020 Report: COVID-19 & Alternative Voting Methods

·         Executive Committee Report (September 2020) – Item EX16.7:

o    Title: The Impact of COVID-19 on 2022 Election Preparation Activities

o    Context: During pandemic planning for the 2022 election, City Council requested staff to re-examine alternative voting methods. The City Clerk's report explicitly concluded that internet voting still carried insurmountable cybersecurity vulnerabilities for a city of Toronto's size. Instead, the City opted to expand digital tools (the MyVote portal) and mail-in voting rather than full digital casting.

o    Reference Document: Toronto Background Staff File (EX16.7 - Sept 2020)

4. Key Independent Studies on Ontario Municipal Internet Voting

In addition to internal Toronto staff reports, independent academic and policy studies frequently examine why Toronto and Ottawa have refrained while smaller Ontario towns use it:

·         Carleton University Cybersecurity Study (2025):

o    Focus: Analyzed security vulnerabilities and credential distribution flaws (e.g., mail PINs) across 70% of Ontario municipal online elections in 2022, offering strong empirical data on why larger cities remain hesitant.

·         Elections Ontario Assessment (2013):

o    Focus: Evaluated internet and telephone voting across the province, highlighting trade-offs between voter accessibility and systemic auditability.

 

 

                                                                  

Contact us: info@fordemocracy.ca                  fb.me/fordemocracycanada